Skip to main content
Log in

Systematics, ontogeny, and phylogenetic implications of exceptional anatomically preserved cycadophyte leaves from the Middle Jurassic of Bearreraig Bay, Skye, northwest Scotland

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Middle Jurassic (Aalenian-Bajocian) shallow marine deposits of Bearreraig Bay, Skye, northwest Scotland, have yielded calcite-permineralized leaves of cycadophytes showing unusually well preserved anatomy. Morphological characters identify the leaves asNilssonia cf.tenuinervis Seward (Cycadales),Otozamites mortonii sp. nov. (Bennettitales), a putative juvenile leaf showing imbricate, recurved pinnae, andOtozamites sp. Permineralized Jurassic cycadophytes occur in only four other localities worldwide; the better-known coeval adpression flora of Yorkshire lacks anatomical preservation. Past studies of fossil cycadophyte species have therefore emphasized morphology, whereas the Skye specimens reveal details of anatomy greatly exceeding published descriptions of similar species. The arrangement of vascular tissues in the rachis ofOtozamites resembles that described forPtilophyllum cutchense Morris (Bennettitales) from India. Stomata observed in the preserved cuticle of theNilssonia leaf superficially resemble those of the extant cycadMacrozamia Miquel. Given the 180 million years separating these two genera, and the fragmentary preservation and equivocal phylogenetic position ofNilssonia, comparative interpretations remain tentative. Leaf characters have been little used in phylogenetic analyses, reflecting exaggerated fears of anatomical and morphological convergence; these characters therefore require particular attention when comparing fossil cycadophytes with their living relatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Archangelsks A., R. Andreis, S. Archangelsky &A. Artabe. 1995. Cuticular characters adapted to volcanic stress in a new Cretaceous cycad leaf from Patagonia, Argentina. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 89: 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barale, G. 1981. La paléoflore Jurassique du Jura Français. Documents de Laboratoire de Géologie Lyon, 81.

  • Barbacka, M. &J. H. A. van Konijnenburg-van Cittert. 1998. Sun and shade leaves in two Jurassic species of pteridosperms. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 103: 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, R. M. 1999. Bulk geochemistry as a guide to provenance and diagenesis. Pp. 169–173in T. P. Jones & N. P. Rowe (eds.), Fossil plants and spores: Modern techniques. Geological Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &N. Morton. 1994. New petrified Middle Jurassic floras from nearshore marine sediments at Bearreraig, Skye. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 88 (abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • — &N. J. Simpson. 1998. Comparing phylogenetic signals from reproductive and vegetative organs. Pp. 231–253in S. J. Owens & P. J. Rudall (eds.), Reproductive biology in systematics, conservation and economic botany. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,N. Morton &B. L. Dower. 2000. Early Middle Jurassic communities in northwest Scotland: Paleoecological and paleoclimatic significance. Pp. 501–511in R. Hall, P. Smith & T. Poulton (eds.), GeoResearch Forum 6 (Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on the Jurassic System). TransTech Publications, Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bold, H. C., C. J. Alexopoulos &T. Delevoryas. 1987. Morphology of plants and fungi. Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, M. N. 1953.Ptilophyllum amarjolense, sp. nov. from the Rajmahal Hills, Bihar. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci., India 19: 605–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &M. L. Kasat. 1972a. The genusPtilophyllum in India. Palaeobotanist 19: 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1972b. On a petrified specimen ofDictyozamites from the Rajmahal Hills, India. Palaeobotanist 19: 248–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaw, S.-M., C. L. Parkinson, Y. Cheng, T. M. Vincent &J. D. Palmer. 2000. Seed-plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: Monophyly of extant gymnosperms and origins of Gnetales from conifers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 4086–4091.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, P. R. 1985a. Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 72: 716–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1985b. Morphology and relationships of the Bennettitales. Pp. 162–175in R. A. Spicer & B. A. Thomas (eds.), Systematic and taxonomic approaches in palaeobotany. Systematics Association Special Publication 31. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1988. Major clades and relationships in “higher” gymnosperms. Pp. 218–272in C. B. Beck (ed.), Origin and evolution of gymnosperms. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delevoryas, T. 1962. Morphology and evolution of fossil plants. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1968. Some aspects of cycadeoid evolution. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 61: 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1982. Perspectives on the origin of cycads and cycadeoids. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 37: 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donoghue, M. J., J. A. Doyle, J. Gauthier, A. G Kluge &T. M. Rowe. 1989. The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 431–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. A. &M. J. Donoghue. 1986. Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach. Bot. Rev. 52: 321–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1987. The importance of fossils in elucidating seed plant phylogeny and macroevolution. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 50: 63–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —— 1992. Fossils and seed plant phylogeny reanalyzed. Brittonia 44: 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esau, K. 1953. Plant anatomy. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahn, A. 1967. Plant anatomy. Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florin, R. 1933. Studien über Cycadales des Mesozoicums nebst Erorterungen über die Spaltöffnungsapparate der Bennettitales. K. svenska. Vetensk Akad. Handl., Tredje Ser. 12: 1–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, E. M. &A. S. Foster. 1989. Morphology and evolution of vascular plants. Ed 3. W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, W. H. &H. W. Pfefferkorn. 1986. Taeniopterid lamina onPhasmatocycas megasporophylls (Cycadales) from the Lower Permian of Kansas, U.S.A. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 49: 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greguss, P. 1965. The relationships of Cycadales on the basis of their xylotomy, branching and leaf epidermis. Palaeobotanist 14: 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, T. M. 1937. The fossil flora of Scoresby Sound, East Greenland. Medd, Grønland, Khøbenhavn, 112: 1–114, pl. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1961. The fossil cycads. Palaeontology 4: 313–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1964. The Yorkshire Jurassic flora, II. Caytoniales, Cycadales and Pteridospermales. British Museum (Natural History), London.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1969. The Yorkshire Jurassic Flora, III. Bennettitales. British Museum (Natural History), London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. L. 1993. Cycads of the world. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. &N. P. Rowe (eds.). 1999. Fossil plants and spores: Modern techniques. Geological Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, K. W., A. J. Willis &W. S. Lacey 1956. A rapid cellulose peel technique in palaeobotany. Ann. Bot. 20: 635–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, T. &M. Tsujii. 1982. Early Jurassic plants of Japan. Part 4. Trans. Proc. Palaeont. Soc. Japan, N.S. 125: 259–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krassilov, V. A. 1976. Bennettitalean stomata. Palaeobotanist 25: 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvacek, J. 1995. Cycadales and Bennettitales leaf compressions of the Bohemian Cenomanian, Central Europe. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 84: 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loconte, H. &D. W. Stevenson. 1990. Cladistics of the Spermatophyta. Brittonia 42: 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magallon, S. &M. J. Sanderson. 2002. Relationships among seed plants inferred from highly conserved genes: Sorting conflicting phylogenetic signals among ancient lineages. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1991–2006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meeuse, A. D. J. 1961. The Pentoxylales and the origin of the monocotyledons. Proc. Koninklijke Neederl. Akad. Wentsensch. 82: 343–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, N. 1984. Aalenian-Bajocian boundary at Bearreraig, Isle of Skye, Scotland. Pp. 341–352in J. Michelsen and A. Zeiss (eds.), International Symposium on Jurassic Stratigraphy. Geological Survey of Denmark, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, K. C., W. L. Crepet, D. Stevenson &E. M. Friis. 1994. A reevaluation of seed plant phylogeny. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 484–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norstog, K. &T. Nicholls. 1997. The biology of the cycads. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, T. C. B. 1976. Flora from the Wealden plant-debris beds of England. Palaeontology 19: 1–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pant, D. D. 1987. The fossil history and phylogeny of the Cycadales. Geophytology, 17: 125–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1990. On the genusGlandulataenia from the Triassic of Nidpuri, India. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 57: 186–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &D. D. Nautiyal. 1963. Cuticle and epidermis of recent Cycadales: Leaves sporangia and seeds. Senck. Biol. 44: 257–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Person, C. P. &T. Delevoryas. 1982. The Middle Jurassic flora of Oaxaca, Mexico. Palaeontographica Abt. B 180: 82–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, T. L. &W. A. DiMichele. 1992. Comparative ecology and life-history biology of arborescent lycopsids in Late Carboniferous swamps of Euramerica. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 560–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole, J. P. 1923. Comparative anatomy of leaves of cycads, with reference to the cycadofilicales. Bot. Gaz. 76: 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A. R. &V. Achuthan 1967. Further contribution to our knowledge ofPtilophyllum. Palaeobotanist 16: 249–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, G W. &R. Serbet. 1994. Lignophyte phylogeny and the evolution of spermatophytes: A numerical cladistic analysis. Syst. Bot. 19: 443–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seward, A. C. 1911. The Jurassic flora of Sutherland. Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh 47: 643–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, B. D. 1967. Investigations on the Jurassic flora of Rajmahal Hills, India. Palaeontographica Abt. B. 120: 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis &M. J. Zanis. 2002. Phylogeny of seed plants based on evidence from eight genes. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1670–1681.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, D. W. 1981. Observations on ptyxis, phenology, and trichomes in the Cycadales and their systematic implications. Amer. J. Bot. 68: 1104–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1990. Morpholgy and systematics of the Cycadales. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 57: 8–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. J. Norstog &D. V. Molsen. 1996. Midribs of cycad pinnae. Brittonia 48: 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, W. N. &G W. Rothwell. 1993. Paleobotany and the evolution of plants. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopes, M. C. 1910. The internal anatomyof “Nilssonia orientalist” Ann. Bot. 14: 389–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhk-Dev &Zeba-Bano. 1975. Three species ofPtilophyllum from Basna, Madhya Pradesh. Palaeobotanist 24: 161–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. N. &E. L. Taylor. 1993. The biology and evolution of fossil plants. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theissen, G., A. Becker, K.-U. Winter, T. Münster, C. Kirchner &H. Saedler. 2002. How the land plants learned their floral ABCs: The role of MADS-box genes in the evolutionary origin of flowers. Pp. 173–205in Q. C. B. Cronk, R. M. Bateman & J. A. Hawkins (eds.), Developmental genetics and plant evolution. Taylor & Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas B. A. &R. A. Spicer. 1987. The evolution and palaeobiology of land plants. Croom Helm, London and Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H. H. 1925. The Caytoniales: A new group of angiospermous plants from the Jurassic rocks of Yorkshire. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 213: 299–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell, W. D., J.-H. Kim &T. Kimura. 1987. Mid-Mesozoic leaves from near Ida Bay, southern Tasmania, Australia. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasmania 121: 159–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Konijnenburg-van Cittert, J. H. A. &J. van der Burgh. 1989. The flora from the Kimmeridgian (Upper Jurassic) of Culgower, Sutherland, Scotland. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 61: 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. &C. A. Sincock. 1992. Bennettitales of the English Wealden. Monograph of the Palaeontological Society, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dower, B.L., Bateman, R.M. & Stevenson, D.W. Systematics, ontogeny, and phylogenetic implications of exceptional anatomically preserved cycadophyte leaves from the Middle Jurassic of Bearreraig Bay, Skye, northwest Scotland. Bot. Rev 70, 105–120 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2004)070[0105:SOAPIO]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2004)070[0105:SOAPIO]2.0.CO;2

Keywords

Navigation